User talk:Nefertum17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Closed.

Thanks[edit]

WikiThanks.png

Thanks for cleaning up Suez Canal and its incarnations in related articles. What'd you say, are you leaving? Please don't, we need people like you! Maybe you just need a wikivacation. Anyway, I regret to see you go. Kind regards, — mark 12:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I second that. I was just looking over the argument at talk:Bast, and you were absolutely in the right (though I would prefer to keep the article at Bast simply because it is the more familiar form in English). You've done some great work on the Egyptology articles, and I hope you can be convinced to return. --Iustinus 23:42, 9 July 2005 (UTC)

Shishak vs Shishaq[edit]

Please take a look at Talk:Shishaq - our naming convention says use the most common name, which is Shishak. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Karl Richard Lepsius[edit]

Hello dear Nefertum, i am actually working on the article mentioned of Karl Richard Lepsius and hope you can help me, if you want to spent time for this. With your addition, you also add a booke cite that I can't follow exactly, because it is to nothing in the article referenced in my opinion. Is it possible for you, to remember what you exactly have cited, so we can verify this detailed reference. Thank you and I hope to *read* from you quick. Kind regards, Abani79 (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)